Proof

We publish every result — including the ones that don’t work.

We have been doing this since November 2025, so there are no case studies to show you yet — and we would rather say that than pad this page with stock logos. What you will find here instead is what a result looks like when it lands, and how you can check it.

// what a published readout contains

Workflow measuredNamed, one metric
Baseline, signed offBefore any build
Systems integratedNamed, in the client’s accounts
Human approvalWhere it stays, stated
Time to liveDays from baseline to production
Adoption at day 90% of team, tracked
DeltaPublished as measured
Readouts published 0

Founding clients

Reduced fixed pricing, in exchange for the numbers.

Our first engagements run as founding-client work: reduced fixed pricing in exchange for permission to publish the before-and-after numbers. Anonymised if you prefer — “a 40-person logistics firm” rather than your name.

Good or bad, the delta gets published as measured. That is the deal, and it is the reason we insist on recording the baseline first.

Places are limited by delivery capacity, not by a countdown clock.

How a result gets checked

A number you can verify, not a testimonial you have to trust.

1

Baseline, signed and dated

One workflow, one metric, measured the way it actually runs — and signed by both of us before anything is built.

2

Same metric, same method

On day 90 we measure again exactly the way we measured at the start. Not a different number that happens to look better.

3

Published as measured

The delta is handed over in writing and published here, anonymised if you prefer. Flattering or not.

That baseline document is what makes a result checkable rather than a matter of opinion. It is the one thing every engagement produces before a line of anything is built.

Where the numbers on the homepage come from

Third-party research. Not Binarify results.

95%

of enterprise GenAI pilots produced no measurable P&L return. MIT Project NANDA, 2025

42%

of companies abandoned most of their AI initiatives in 2025, up from 17% the year before. S&P Global

14%

of small businesses that use AI have it fully embedded — 76% use it. Goldman Sachs, 2026

These are the studies the homepage quotes. They describe the industry, not us — our own numbers appear on this page only once a founding client’s readout is published.

In full: The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025, MIT Project NANDA (Challapally, Pease, Raskar and Chari, 2025), which reviewed more than 300 public AI initiatives alongside 52 interviews and 153 survey responses; Generative AI shows rapid growth but yields mixed results, S&P Global Market Intelligence, from a survey of 1,006 organisations; and the Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Voices survey, fielded January to February 2026. Each figure above links to a page where you can check it.

One workflow. One number. 90 days.

Thirty minutes, no deck. We look at the workflows you already run and tell you which one is worth measuring first.

Book a 30-minute call

No sales deck. No follow-up sequence.